Predictive insights with statistical integrity

At Subvertadown, a track record of predictive accuracy against other rankings is just the starting point.

What followers here really appreciate is the deeper analysis that helps them take ownership of their decisions. Intuitive visualizations reveal the range of outcomes they can expect, grounded in historical data. Predictive models break down the components of fantasy scores, helping them understand the real drivers—and where points are likely to come from. Forward-looking projections help them plan ahead, weigh their options, and make smarter roster moves. And specialized tools, like D/ST Pairing, help them make better use of their bench space.

It's about extracting clearer, more actionable insights from analysis that's otherwise too complex— so you can make informed decisions with greater confidence, rather than relying on rankings alone.

Whether you're discovering my work through JJ Zachariason’s LateRound, where I provide kicker rankings, or through word-of-mouth, you're probably here because you trust in the value of meaningful predictive signals, to make better-informed fantasy decisions.

The live visualizations featured on this page demonstrate just some of the deeper analysis that "goes beyond just rankings": guidance for multi-week planning, visuals that explain what causes a high or low ranking, and visuals that depict actual historical "range of outcomes" for similar matchups.

Rankings for Fantasy Football Flex Players

Weekly RB, WR, and TE rankings for 0.5 PPR. · Week 6

Position
Rankings for Fantasy Football Flex Players
Rank Player Tm Matchup Proj
1 ATL-1 vs. CHI 15.4
2 SF-1 vs. WAS 15.4
3 LAR-1 vs. ARI 15.2
4 KC-1 vs. LAC 14.6
5 IND-1 vs. TEN 14.6
6 BAL-1 @ CLE 14.2
7 LAR-1 vs. ARI 14.2
8 CHI-1 @ ATL 13.8
9 BUF-1 @ LV 13.8
10 SF-1 vs. WAS 13.8
11 CAR-1 @ PHI 13.7
12 DAL-1 @ GB 13.7
13 ATL-1 vs. CHI 13.6
14 SEA-1 @ DEN 13.5
15 DAL-1 @ GB 13.3
16 LV-1 vs. BUF 12.9
17 LV-1 vs. BUF 12.4
18 SF-1 vs. WAS 12.4
19 GB-1 vs. DAL 12.2
20 NO-1 @ NYG 11.7
21 ARI-1 @ LAR 11.5
22 PIT-1 @ TB 11.2
23 JAC-1 @ HOU 10.9
24 DAL-2 @ GB 10.7
25 HOU-1 @ JAC 10.7
26 CAR-1 @ PHI 10.7
27 NYJ-1 @ NE 10.7
28 NYG-1 vs. NO 10.7
29 LAR-2 vs. ARI 10.5
30 BAL-1 @ CLE 10.3
31 GB-2 vs. DAL 10.1
32 NYG-1 vs. NO 10.1
33 NE-1 vs. NYJ 10.0
34 ARI-1 @ LAR 10.0
35 HOU-1 @ JAC 9.9
36 ARI-1 @ LAR 9.9
37 NYJ-1 @ NE 9.9
38 SEA-1 @ DEN 9.9
39 IND-1 vs. TEN 9.8
40 CAR-2 @ PHI 9.8
41 JAC-1 @ HOU 9.8
42 KC-1 vs. LAC 9.7
43 PHI-1 vs. CAR 9.6
44 GB-1 vs. DAL 9.6
45 TB-1 vs. PIT 9.5
46 GB-1 vs. DAL 9.3
47 PIT-1 @ TB 9.2
48 KC-1 vs. LAC 9.1
49 CHI-1 @ ATL 9.0
50 PHI-1 vs. CAR 8.9
51 BUF-1 @ LV 8.8
52 NYG-1 vs. NO 8.8
53 CHI-2 @ ATL 8.8
54 IND-2 vs. TEN 8.6
55 DEN-1 vs. SEA 8.6
56 TEN-1 @ IND 8.6
57 CLE-1 vs. BAL 8.5
58 LAC-1 @ KC 8.5
59 TEN-2 @ IND 8.5
60 TEN-1 @ IND 8.4
61 WAS-1 @ SF 8.4
62 WAS-1 @ SF 8.4
63 NO-2 @ NYG 8.4
64 CHI-1 @ ATL 8.2
65 LAR-1 vs. ARI 8.0
66 NO-1 @ NYG 7.9
67 NE-1 vs. NYJ 7.9
68 DEN-1 vs. SEA 7.7
69 LAR-2 vs. ARI 7.7
70 JAC-2 @ HOU 7.7
71 DEN-2 vs. SEA 7.7
72 TB-1 vs. PIT 7.7
73 PIT-2 @ TB 7.6
74 BUF-1 @ LV 7.6
75 NE-1 vs. NYJ 7.6
76 JAC-1 @ HOU 7.6
77 CAR-1 @ PHI 7.5
78 PHI-1 vs. CAR 7.5
79 ATL-1 vs. CHI 7.5
80 CLE-1 vs. BAL 7.5
81 NE-2 vs. NYJ 7.4
82 LV-1 vs. BUF 7.4
83 LAC-1 @ KC 7.3
84 IND-3 vs. TEN 7.3
85 PIT-1 @ TB 6.9
86 TB-2 vs. PIT 6.9
87 DEN-2 vs. SEA 6.9
88 BUF-2 @ LV 6.9
89 CLE-1 vs. BAL 6.8
90 BAL-1 @ CLE 6.7
91 LV-2 vs. BUF 6.7
92 WAS-2 @ SF 6.6
93 SF-2 vs. WAS 6.6
94 DAL-3 @ GB 6.5
95 KC-2 vs. LAC 6.4
96 NE-3 vs. NYJ 6.4
97 HOU-2 @ JAC 6.4
98 CLE-2 vs. BAL 6.4
99 ARI-2 @ LAR 6.4
100 ATL-2 vs. CHI 6.3
101 WAS-3 @ SF 6.3
102 CHI-3 @ ATL 6.2
103 LAC-1 @ KC 6.2
104 PIT-2 @ TB 6.2
105 DAL-1 @ GB 6.2
106 PHI-2 vs. CAR 6.2
107 NO-1 @ NYG 6.1
108 LV-2 vs. BUF 6.0
109 ATL-2 vs. CHI 5.9
110 SEA-1 @ DEN 5.9
111 NO-2 @ NYG 5.9
112 NE-2 vs. NYJ 5.8
113 TB-1 vs. PIT 5.8
114 NE-4 vs. NYJ 5.8
115 HOU-1 @ JAC 5.7
116 WAS-1 @ SF 5.7
117 NYG-2 vs. NO 5.7
118 LAR-2 vs. ARI 5.6
119 DEN-1 vs. SEA 5.6
120 TEN-2 @ IND 5.5
121 SEA-2 @ DEN 5.5
122 LAC-2 @ KC 5.5
123 WAS-2 @ SF 5.4
124 KC-3 vs. LAC 5.2
125 JAC-3 @ HOU 5.2
126 HOU-3 @ JAC 5.2
127 LAC-2 @ KC 5.2
128 NYG-3 vs. NO 5.1
129 PIT-2 @ TB 5.1
130 LAC-2 @ KC 5.1
131 BAL-2 @ CLE 5.0
132 SEA-2 @ DEN 5.0
133 TB-2 vs. PIT 5.0
134 TEN-1 @ IND 5.0
135 NYJ-2 @ NE 4.9
136 KC-2 vs. LAC 4.9
137 LV-2 vs. BUF 4.9
138 PHI-3 vs. CAR 4.8
139 SF-2 vs. WAS 4.8
140 BUF-3 @ LV 4.6
141 SEA-3 @ DEN 4.5
142 LAC-3 @ KC 4.5
143 HOU-4 @ JAC 4.5
144 SF-3 vs. WAS 4.4
145 GB-2 vs. DAL 4.3
146 TB-3 vs. PIT 4.3
147 NO-3 @ NYG 4.3
148 IND-4 vs. TEN 4.3
149 TEN-3 @ IND 4.3
150 HOU-5 @ JAC 4.3
151 NYJ-3 @ NE 4.3
152 NE-5 vs. NYJ 4.3
153 LAR-3 vs. ARI 4.2
154 DEN-3 vs. SEA 4.1
155 CAR-3 @ PHI 4.1
156 CLE-3 vs. BAL 4.1
157 PHI-4 vs. CAR 4.1
158 GB-3 vs. DAL 4.1
159 DEN-4 vs. SEA 4.0
160 CLE-4 vs. BAL 4.0
161 ATL-3 vs. CHI 4.0
162 CHI-4 @ ATL 4.0
163 KC-4 vs. LAC 3.9
164 JAC-2 @ HOU 3.9
165 BUF-4 @ LV 3.9
166 GB-3 vs. DAL 3.7
167 NYG-2 vs. NO 3.7
168 CHI-2 @ ATL 3.7
169 BUF-2 @ LV 3.5
170 IND-2 vs. TEN 3.5
171 BAL-2 @ CLE 3.5
172 NYJ-2 @ NE 3.3
173 DAL-2 @ GB 3.1
174 TB-3 vs. PIT 3.0
175 BUF-3 @ LV 3.0
176 NO-3 @ NYG 2.9
177 NYG-3 vs. NO 2.9
178 NE-3 vs. NYJ 2.6
179 SF-3 vs. WAS 0.7
180 TEN-3 @ IND 0.5

Refreshed 1 hour ago

Strategize who you stream—and plan your “holds” by using 17-week forecasting charts. Fantasy scores are projected for QB, D/ST, and Kicker, and Strength of Schedule charts project fantasy point deviations for RB, WR, and TE.

D/STs

Player/Team 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 AVG
Patriots 10.9 5.0 8.3 6.4 5.1 - 6.6 5.2 6.6 6.0 8.1 5.7 6.7
Steelers 9.5 5.6 8.5 - 4.4 6.6 4.7 6.3 6.1 5.6 5.2 6.1 6.2

Quarterbacks

Player/Team 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 AVG
Josh Allen | BUF 25.2 - 21.1 18.2 18.6 19.3 20.5 18.4 19.8 21.4 19.8 19.1 20.1
Brock Purdy | SF 21.9 20.6 - 20.1 18.7 17.9 17.4 18.6 17.4 18.4 16.8 18.0 18.7

This is the most useful way to think about your kicker’s opportunities: Where on the field the play is likely to stop. Get unique visual insight to each kicker’s volumes and likely field positions.

Spencer Shrader

  • More kicking opportunities overall, at all distances.
  • Less likely to take long kicks, despite drives stopping upfield.
  • Fewer drives stalling before reaching kicking range
  • Bolstered by a floor of RZ opportunities.

How to read this chart

The range of possible outcomes is a truly key consideration for anyone serious about strategizing their lineups. My algorithms search for the most similar historical matches and show you what actually happened.

Patriots Similar historical matchups

Matchup Year Wk Result
Similar Broncos vs Commanders 2023 2 1
Similar Giants vs 49ers 2015 5 1
Boom Packers vs Bills 2018 4 20
Bust Broncos vs Commanders 2023 2 1