| Wk 17 Proj. Stats | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Team |
Wk 17
|
Wk 17 Trend |
Wk 18
|
Wk 19
|
Hold? |
Err.
|
PA
|
YA
|
Int.
|
Sacks
|
FR
|
TD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dolphins @ Browns |
Similar historical matchups
Why so high?
Why so low?
|
CLE 11.1 |
|
- | - | 4.7 | 20.3 | 264 | 0.8 | 3.3 | 0.5 | 0.15 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Eagles vs. Cowboys |
Similar historical matchups
Why so high?
Why so low?
|
DAL 10.3 |
|
- | - | 4.8 | 17.1 | 270 | 0.8 | 2.8 | 0.5 | 0.14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Colts @ Giants |
Similar historical matchups
Why so high?
Why so low?
|
NYG 9.8 |
|
- | - | 5.1 | 16.7 | 295 | 0.8 | 3.1 | 0.6 | 0.16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Seahawks @ Bears |
Similar historical matchups
Why so high?
Why so low?
|
CHI 8.9 |
|
- | - | 4.8 | 19.4 | 308 | 0.9 | 3.2 | 0.5 | 0.18 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Browns vs. Dolphins |
Similar historical matchups
Why so high?
Why so low?
|
MIA 8.8 |
|
- | - | 4.5 | 22.2 | 288 | 0.6 | 2.4 | 0.5 | 0.15 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bills vs. Jets |
Similar historical matchups
Why so high?
Why so low?
|
NYJ 8.6 |
|
- | - | 5.1 | 20.1 | 300 | 0.8 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 0.14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chargers @ Patriots |
Similar historical matchups
Why so high?
|
NE 8.2 |
|
- | - | 4.4 | 18.1 | 325 | 0.7 | 3.0 | 0.6 | 0.11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Buccaneers vs. Panthers |
Similar historical matchups
Why so high?
Why so low?
|
CAR 8.0 |
|
- | - | 4.9 | 19.9 | 324 | 0.9 | 2.7 | 0.5 | 0.16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jaguars vs. Titans |
Similar historical matchups
Why so high?
Why so low?
|
TEN 7.8 |
|
- | - | - | 5.0 | 21.1 | 329 | 0.7 | 2.7 | 0.5 | 0.21 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Raiders @ Saints |
Similar historical matchups
Why so high?
Why so low?
|
NO 7.7 |
|
- | - | - | 4.7 | 23.5 | 301 | 0.8 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Titans @ Jaguars |
Similar historical matchups
Why so high?
Why so low?
|
JAC 7.6 |
|
- | - | - | 4.6 | 23.1 | 295 | 0.7 | 2.4 | 0.5 | 0.10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commanders vs. Falcons |
Similar historical matchups
Why so high?
Why so low?
|
ATL 7.4 |
|
- | - | - | 4.4 | 21.9 | 313 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 0.5 | 0.17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Saints vs. Raiders |
Similar historical matchups
Why so high?
Why so low?
|
LV 7.2 |
|
- | - | - | 4.6 | 17.7 | 338 | 0.8 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cowboys @ Eagles |
Similar historical matchups
Why so high?
Why so low?
|
PHI 6.9 |
|
- | - | - | 4.9 | 26.0 | 333 | 0.6 | 2.3 | 0.5 | 0.19 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ravens @ Texans |
Similar historical matchups
Why so high?
Why so low?
|
HOU 6.7 |
|
- | - | - | 4.7 | 19.9 | 338 | 1.0 | 3.1 | 0.5 | 0.13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chiefs @ Steelers |
Similar historical matchups
Why so high?
Why so low?
|
PIT 6.3 |
|
- | - | - | 4.4 | 19.8 | 329 | 0.8 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rams vs. Cardinals |
Similar historical matchups
Why so high?
Why so low?
|
ARI 6.3 |
|
- | - | - | 5.2 | 22.7 | 333 | 0.8 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 0.15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Falcons @ Commanders |
Similar historical matchups
Why so high?
Why so low?
|
WAS 5.9 |
|
- | - | - | 5.2 | 26.5 | 349 | 0.6 | 2.7 | 0.6 | 0.16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bengals vs. Broncos |
Why so low?
|
DEN 5.8 |
|
- | - | - | 4.6 | 24.4 | 344 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 0.5 | 0.15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lions @ 49ers |
Why so low?
|
SF 5.7 |
|
- | - | - | 4.9 | 20.0 | 361 | 0.8 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bears vs. Seahawks |
Why so high?
Why so low?
|
SEA 5.5 |
|
- | - | - | 4.0 | 23.1 | 349 | 0.7 | 2.6 | 0.4 | 0.17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Broncos @ Bengals |
Why so low?
|
CIN 4.8 |
|
- | - | - | 5.0 | 26.8 | 379 | 0.9 | 2.5 | 0.6 | 0.17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Packers @ Vikings |
Why so low?
|
MIN 4.7 |
|
- | - | - | 4.4 | 25.5 | 369 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 0.5 | 0.11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Steelers vs. Chiefs |
Why so high?
Why so low?
|
KC 4.7 |
|
- | - | - | 4.3 | 22.3 | 356 | 0.8 | 2.4 | 0.4 | 0.15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Patriots vs. Chargers |
Why so low?
|
LAC 4.5 |
|
- | - | - | 4.3 | 24.9 | 359 | 0.6 | 2.4 | 0.4 | 0.08 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Giants vs. Colts |
Why so high?
Why so low?
|
IND 4.4 |
|
- | - | - | 4.3 | 23.2 | 351 | 0.8 | 1.9 | 0.4 | 0.16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vikings vs. Packers |
Why so high?
Why so low?
|
GB 4.2 |
|
- | - | - | 4.3 | 23.1 | 364 | 0.9 | 1.9 | 0.4 | 0.17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cardinals @ Rams |
Why so low?
|
LAR 3.5 |
|
- | - | - | 4.8 | 24.1 | 386 | 0.6 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 0.15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Texans vs. Ravens |
Why so low?
|
BAL 3.2 |
|
- | - | - | 4.5 | 28.5 | 375 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 0.5 | 0.08 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Panthers @ Buccaneers |
Why so low?
|
TB 2.8 |
|
- | - | - | 4.6 | 31.8 | 391 | 0.6 | 2.3 | 0.5 | 0.12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jets @ Bills |
Why so low?
|
BUF 2.8 |
|
- | - | - | 4.2 | 30.0 | 367 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 0.08 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 49ers vs. Lions |
Why so low?
|
DET 2.4 |
|
- | - | - | 4.8 | 30.2 | 379 | 0.8 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 0.10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Refreshed 2 months ago
3 months ago
Q: Accounted for player returning? (or acquired from trade)
A: Yes, included, thanks.
3 months ago
Q: Accounted for absence? (usually only if ruled out or traded away)
A: Yes, updated now, thanks!
3 months ago
Q: Accounted for player returning? (or acquired from trade)
A: No, but I will update soon. Thanks.
3 months ago
Q: Accounted for questionable tag? (normally not)
A: No, but I will update soon. Thanks.
3 months ago
Q: Accounted for absence? (usually only if ruled out or traded away)
A: Yes, included, thanks.
3 months ago
Q: Accounted for absence? (usually only if ruled out or traded away)
A: Yes, included, thanks.
3 months ago
Q: Accounted for player returning? (or acquired from trade)
A: Yes. But assuming a minor effect.
3 months ago
Q: Accounted for absence? (usually only if ruled out or traded away)
A: Yes. Assuming he'll be absent.
3 months ago
Q: Accounted for absence? (usually only if ruled out or traded away)
A: Yes. Assuming he'll be absent.
3 months ago
Q: Accounted for absence? (usually only if ruled out or traded away)
A: Yes. But assuming a minor effect.
3 months ago
Q: Accounted for absence? (usually only if ruled out or traded away)
A: Yes. Assuming he'll be absent.
3 months ago
Q: Accounted for questionable tag? (normally not)
A: Yes. Assuming he'll be absent.
3 months ago
Q: Accounted for absence? (usually only if ruled out or traded away)
A: Yes, updated now, thanks!
3 months ago
Q: Current injury status considered?
A: Yes, updated now, thanks!
3 months ago
Q: Current injury status considered?
A: Yes, updated now, thanks!
3 months ago
Q: Current injury status considered?
A: Yes, updated now, thanks!
3 months ago
Q: Current injury status considered?
A: Yes, updated now, thanks!
3 months ago
Q: Accounted for absence? (usually only if ruled out or traded away)
A: Yes, updated now, thanks!
3 months ago
Q: Accounted for absence? (usually only if ruled out or traded away)
A: Yes. But assuming a minor effect.
3 months ago
Q: Accounted for questionable tag? (normally not)
A: Sorry, you need to enter a specific player name.
3 months ago
Q: Current injury status considered?
A: Sorry, you need to enter a specific player name.