By Subvertadown
Tagged under
Accuracy , BackgroundNone of these rankings would exist, if I wasn't convinced the models are as accurate as we can reasonably expect.
I have previously spent a lot of time explaining 2 things that seem contradictory:
All rankings are “bad”-- strictly speaking, they will never be accurate or trustworthy.
My models are less bad than the next guy. I know this because I measure accuracy.
Most followers get confidence from knowing my methodology. Knowing how the underlying data is treated .
But my accuracy reports have given validation. Measuring the results doesn’t only give me feedback to improve— It’s also the only way I know it's not all a huge waste of time! And I hate wasting time.
For more information about accuracy, click on the "Accuracy" tag in Articles.
/Subvertadown
Tagged under
D/ST , Expectations , Quarterback , Understanding StatisticsTagged under
Accuracy , Expectations , ModelingTagged under
Modeling , Understanding StatisticsTagged under
D/ST , Season StrategyTagged under
Background , ModelingTagged under
Background , ModelingTagged under
Exclusive , ModelingTagged under
Kicker , ModelingTagged under
D/ST , ModelingTagged under
D/ST , Weekly StrategyTagged under
D/ST , Expectations , Weekly StrategyTagged under
D/ST , ExpectationsTagged under
D/ST , Modeling